[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       dspam-users
Subject:    Re: [Dspam-user] dspam and dovecot antispam
From:       Wicher <wicher () gavagai ! eu>
Date:       2012-07-03 20:38:24
Message-ID: CAFETW+YzbzsqVvHjefw8kbWz9Wxznr6acNGufyFndMKf0eJyLQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Stevan Bajić <stevan@bajic.ch> wrote:
> On 03.07.2012 21:11, Wicher wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Stevan Bajić <stevan@bajic.ch> wrote:
> > > On 30.06.2012 02:15, Terry Barnum wrote:
> > > > Do most people using dovecot's antispam plugin just configure dspam with \
> > > > "spamSubject=" to avoid this situation?
> > > Yes. This is what I have seen most people doing. However... you need to
> > > have another mechanism (usually sieve script) that is moving mail to the
> > > Spam/Junk folder when the X-DSPAM-Result header is
> > > spam/blacklisted/blocklisted/virus.
> > I use:
> > 
> > Postfix, main.cf:
> > recipient_delimiter = +
> > 
> > dspam.conf:
> > EnablePlusedDetail      on
> > QuarantineMailbox      +spam
> > 
> > and then the Dovecot LDA:
> > recipient_delimiter = +
> > 
> > and the Dovecot LMTP to which dspam delivers *all* mail, be it ham or spam:
> > lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes
> > 
> > So what this does is... if a user creates a mailbox with name 'spam',
> > mail classified by dspam as spam will get delivered into this mailbox.
> Mailbox? Are you sure it is a full blown up mailbox?
> 
Sorry about that! Mail folder is indeed what I meant.

> Anyway... I am not 100% sure if you need to specify the recipient
> delimiter in dovecot LDA. As far as I remember you can just use "-m
> ${extension}" option when sending the mail from Postfix to dovecot-lda.
> 
Possibly. But my Postfix does not speak to the dovecot LDA. Rather, it
speaks LMTP to dspam which then speaks LMTP to the dovecot LDA. No
reinjection.

> > Reclassification is handled by dovecot-antispam. No need for Sieve
> > filters, no need to change the subject line.
> The problem still stands that if DSPAM stops working (for whatever
> reason) then you can't see it in the inbox.
> 
True. Actually, in my setup it's critical for dspam to be up & running
for *any* mail to be delivered… So I keep my fingers crossed (not
really, it's solid logging and alerts for me)

Cheers, Wicher Minnaard.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]