[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: dshield
Subject: Re: [Dshield] Local DNS RBL
From: David Cary Hart <DavidHart () tqmcube ! com>
Date: 2005-01-31 19:19:08
Message-ID: 1107199148.7461.41.camel () dch ! TQMcube ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 12:35 -0500, liebl wrote:
> What I'm really saying is that this idea of blocking by country (tld or IP)
> is not the best solution.
>
Doesn't that depend upon the environment?
We have no business requiring that we receive email from China
or Korea. Nor do we expect any.
Virtually 100% of email that we receive from China or Korea has
been Spam.
There is a REAL COST associated with UCE in terms of time and
distraction.
There is a direct correlation between spam and the spread of
viruses that can be even more costly.
Would I not be negligent if we did NOT block all mail from China and
Korea? Why on earth should we accept mail when there is almost a 100%
certainty that it will a) be spam and b) provide no business benefit?
________________________________________________________________________
Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
http://www.TQMcube.com
-------------- Sponsor Message ------------------------------------
SANS Intrusion Immersion Training: Orlando, FL, February 3-9th
http://www.sans.org/orlando05
_______________________________________________
send all posts to list@lists.dshield.org
To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see: http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic