[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: dri-users
Subject: Re: [Dri-users] "gears" runs at only 22fps??
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon () bigfoot ! com>
Date: 2001-05-29 18:09:32
[Download RAW message or body]
>> George Garvey <tmwg-dri@inxservices.com> writes:
> FX_GLIDE_SWAPINTERVAL=0 gives better FPS, but the gears are moving
> slower
No, they are not. At least not strictly speaking. Think about it...
what do you see if the gear rotates with, say, 850 Hz but your monitor
can display only 85 Hz? In 1/85 s it has completed 1/85 * 850 = 10
revolutions. In this case you'd say the gear is standing still. More
interesting is what happens when it rotates at 840 Hz... in terms of
frames per second, and because of the way "gears" is written, the gears
are rotating one at 2*FPS and two at -4*FPS (more or less).
Another interesting thing is what happens when your monitor displays 85
Hz but your application is changing the image at, say, 71 Hz... (these
two things are incidentally the reason why those Quake "benchmarks" are
misleading)
--
Marcelo
_______________________________________________
Dri-users mailing list
Dri-users@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic