--===============2844745840493345008==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256;
 boundary="Sig_/4xxLqfsJrX2abyJ8EseNUTk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--Sig_/4xxLqfsJrX2abyJ8EseNUTk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 29 May 2014 17:11:04 -0400 Digimer <lists@alteeve.ca> wrote:
> As a somewhat separate topic, having the DRBD link use an
> active/passive bond with each link going to a different switch
> (ideally stacked with hitless failover) allows DRBD to operate
> without interruption, regardless of port, cable or even total switch
> failure.

I thing that hit me with such a setup (active-passive-bond with two
switches for the cluster in my case): Its great to fail over when one
switch fails completely due to power-loss or something like that. But
When the switch fails software-wise (failure or misconfiguration) the
network-links will still be up, so no fail-over from the bond is
happening. But no data will go around...

Have fun,

- Arnold

--Sig_/4xxLqfsJrX2abyJ8EseNUTk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlOJ/VEACgkQtuvagsE+DE5e4wD8Cyus+HkbsvnHQ9IR1Iinjmtr
UmhI5qc3AUTH2uxtfdoBAPboddQgGIgfk1RVnrRxo5Emd0RSEvQD2S8cejGRySkF
=D/Br
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/4xxLqfsJrX2abyJ8EseNUTk--

--===============2844745840493345008==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user

--===============2844745840493345008==--