[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       drbd-user
Subject:    [DRBD-user] Re: drbd "short read" ???
From:       Gernot Schmied <gernot.schmied () chello ! at>
Date:       2005-09-22 11:15:23
Message-ID: dgu3o9$89k$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Scott Simpson wrote:
> Philipp Reisner wrote:
> 
>> in DRBD-0.7 there is no explicit shutdown packet in the protocol,
>> so that node simply states, the other side closed the socket, while
>> I expected a packet header... nothing to worry about.
>>  
>>
> Does this mean that drbd-0.8 has this? Knowing the difference between a
> graceful and non-graceful shutdown seems like a good idea.

Well, yes and no. From a purist's point of view this is desirable,
especially for the purpose of log sanity. However, it does not really do
any harm so one might argue that it's pure cosmetics :-).

Gernot

_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic