[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       dpdk-users
Subject:    Re: [dpdk-users] Need help: Generate core list error. rte_eal port num [0] is not match the pciidlis
From:       Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li () gmail ! com>
Date:       2020-06-04 0:47:07
Message-ID: alpine.OSX.2.21.2006031740570.52654 () sea-ml-00029224 ! olympus ! f5net ! com
[Download RAW message or body]



On Wed, 3 Jun 2020, Ding Ma wrote:

> Thanks for reply.
> BTW I guess "CONFIG_RTE_MAX_LCORE=128" means no more than 128 cores.  But what does \
> "CONFIG_RTE_MAX_LCORE_FREQS=64" mean?   

right, CONFIG_RTE_MAX_LCORE_FREQS=64 is irrelevant here I think, something 
relate to power.

# Compile librte_power
CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_POWER=y
CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_POWER_DEBUG=n
CONFIG_RTE_MAX_LCORE_FREQS=64

By the way, I think the patches Stephen talked about to remove 
RTE_MAX_LCORE constrains  is this:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores > RTE_MAX_LCORE
https://marc.info/?l=dpdk-dev&m=159112164120276&w=2


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]