[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       dovecot
Subject:    Re: UNSUBSCRIBE
From:       Stanislav via dovecot <dovecot () dovecot ! org>
Date:       2018-11-30 7:58:49
Message-ID: aeda3ad2fd0eff494c74b6576e33dd21 () tenhi ! ru
[Download RAW message or body]

UNSUBSCRIBE

Gianfranco Bartolini писал 2018-11-30 10:52:
> UNSUBSCRIBE
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces@dovecot.org] On Behalf
>> Of Michael A. Peters
>> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 8:21 AM
>> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
>> Subject: Re: DMARC policies
>> 
>> On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers
>> temporarily
>> > disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now
>> taken actions
>> > to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled
>> members have
>> > been restored.
>> >
>> > Aki
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> I've seen that happen on several lists.
>> 
>> I disabled DMARC on my mail servers. I really like the
>> concept but way
>> way way too many false positives.
>> 
>> Mostly lists, but also what sometimes happens - primary MX for
>> whatever.com is down so mail goes to their backup with then
>> relays it to
>> their primary when primary back up, but their backup MX
>> obviously isn't
>> in my SPF record and they have things mis-configured causing a DMARC
>> trigger.
>> 
>> I like the concept but it seems to have too many problems in
>> implementation.
>> 
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]