[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] My thoughts on usr merge
From: Marc Shapiro via Dng <dng () lists ! dyne ! org>
Date: 2023-11-30 6:08:49
Message-ID: 41a3fe40-0730-4f8a-982c-d28e471c846d () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On 11/28/23 22:05, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all, I don't like the idea of usr merge. It necessitates an
> initramfs if /usr is mounted instead of just being off the root of the
> root drive. And the old way was working: Why mess with success?
Are you saying that as long as the system is booting using an initramfs,
which mine does since it usesa stock kernel, that having a separate
partition for /usr will not be an issue, even after all of this
usr-merge garbage goes into effect?
Marc
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/28/23 22:05, Steve Litt wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20231129010508.01fb2e08@mydesk.domain.cxm">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Hi all,
First of all, I don't like the idea of usr merge. It necessitates an
initramfs if /usr is mounted instead of just being off the root of the
root drive. And the old way was working: Why mess with success?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Are you saying that as long as the system is booting using an
initramfs, which mine does since it uses<span
style="white-space: pre-wrap"> a stock kernel, that having a separate partition \
for /usr will not be an issue, even after all of this usr-merge garbage goes into \
effect?</span></p> <p><span style="white-space: pre-wrap">Marc
</span></p>
</body>
</html>
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic