[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       dm-devel
Subject:    [dm-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 100/219] dm raid: fix false -EBUSY when handling check/repair message
From:       Sasha Levin <sashal () kernel ! org>
Date:       2019-11-22 5:47:12
Message-ID: 20191122054911.1750-93-sashal () kernel ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 74694bcbdf7e28a5ad548cdda9ac56d30be00d13 ]

Sending a check/repair message infrequently leads to -EBUSY instead of
properly identifying an active resync.  This occurs because
raid_message() is testing recovery bits in a racy way.

Fix by calling decipher_sync_action() from raid_message() to properly
identify the idle state of the RAID device.

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index b78a8a4d061ca..416998523d455 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -3690,8 +3690,7 @@ static int raid_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv,
 			set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
 			md_reap_sync_thread(mddev);
 		}
-	} else if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery) ||
-		   test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery))
+	} else if (decipher_sync_action(mddev, mddev->recovery) != st_idle)
 		return -EBUSY;
 	else if (!strcasecmp(argv[0], "resync"))
 		; /* MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED set below */
-- 
2.20.1


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic