[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       dm-crypt
Subject:    Re: [dm-crypt] Partitions on top of LUKS encrypted HD not recognized by kernel
From:       Milan Broz <gmazyland () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-03-30 16:42:09
Message-ID: 55197CE1.1000303 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 03/28/2015 02:05 PM, rainer.herrendoerfer wrote:
> Hello list,
> 
> I'm experimenting with LUKS on a Gentoo-Box. I luksFormat'ted the whole
> harddisk /dev/sda and luksOpen'ed as gentoo, so it appeared as
> /dev/mapper/gentoo. So far so good. When I use LVM and take it as a
> physical volume and set up VGs and LVs they appear in /dev/mapper
> automatically.
> But when trying to use normal partitions instead of LVM, parted can
> mklabel and mkpart but gets a warning that the new partitions are not
> known by the kernel and indeed, they don't appear in /dev/mapper.
> I need to run 'kpartx -av gentoo' that they appear in /dev/mapper and
> then they are normally usable. When trying to luksClose them after
> unmounting them they are 'still in use' until I make the kernel to
> forget them by 'kpartx -d /dev/mapper/gentoo'.
> So is using partitioning on fully encrypted harddisks not supported by
> LUKS at all? Or just a bug in the current version used by Gentoo which
> is 1.6.5?

Partitions over device mapper are not recognized by the kernel, you have
to use kpartx to make them mapped (kpartx does not use kernel partitioning
but use device-mapper as well).

LUKS has nothing to do with partitioning, usually the problem is solved
by some other layer (udisks) that listens to udev messages
and reacts to device removals.

So no, it is not a bug, it is the same problem like you forgot to unmount
filesystem over LUKS device - it cannot be removed without unmounting
it first. It is just different layer here.

Milan
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@saout.de
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]