[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       dm-crypt
Subject:    Re: [dm-crypt] shared block devices
From:       Milan Broz <mbroz () redhat ! com>
Date:       2011-03-30 21:03:04
Message-ID: 4D939A88.70009 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On 03/30/2011 07:29 PM, Michael Zabriskie wrote:
 
> I have been able to gather that a shared block device type setup is not
> supported. I.E. luks + clvm + gfs2, luks + asm, or luks + ocfs2 shared
> across multiple servers. So what I am wondering is if this is on the
> road map or if there is another open source technology out there that
> can accomplish this?

If you have LUKS device and mapped (plaintext) device is exported
through iSCSI/DRBD or whatever to several cluster nodes, it will work
(and use some clustered fs, or maybe clvmd on top of that).
(IOW encryption run only on some master server.)

What you cannot do is to map the underlying device on several nodes
and run LUKS on every node separately (in parallel).
(In principle, with proper barrier/flush support and clustered
fs on top it,  it should work but nobody tests and support these
configurations.) 

Or you have to open exactly on one node and migrate it as service
(similar to HA LVM mode).

(That --non-exclusive option was to map one underlying device to
several mappings on _one_ system, nothing to do with clustered
system.)

Anyway, what is the use case here?

Milan
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@saout.de
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]