[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-user
Subject: Re: What is the recommended way to handle squeeze-proposed-updates?
From: Mark <mamarcac () gmail ! com>
Date: 2011-05-19 23:23:24
Message-ID: BANLkTinQLRupXR85SrfE_O7utY78qO8raA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Camale=F3n <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates
>
> I've never used that repo before :-?
>
>
I hadn't either until I read it was the way to fix the disappearing mouse
pointer issue in Squeeze, here
http://hacksomethingtonight.blogspot.com/2011/04/invisible-mouse-pointer-in=
-debian_19.html
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Freeman <hewho7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Run
>
> apt-cache policy
>
> If squeeze-proposed-updates is a priority of 100, it should update if
> necessary any of the packages installed without adding packages from that
> archive
> unless you manually install.
>
> If squeeze is a priority of 500, you might consider making squeeze your
> default in your /etc/apt/apt.conf file.
>
> As root:
>
> echo 'APT::Default-Release "stable";' >> /etc/apt/apt.conf
>
Thank you Freeman, this is good to know.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
bss@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
>
> >Am I supposed to keep the
> >proposed updates repos active in sources.list for the life of squeeze, o=
r
> do
> >something else?
>
> I wouldn't.
>
> >What if I comment it out now?
>
> Run an update afterward and you should be fine. Some of your packages wi=
ll
> have a newer version than is available on repositories configured for the
> system, but APT has no problem resolving that.
>
Thank you, this is what I did, and apt found 3 packages after commenting ou=
t
the squeeze-proposed-updates lines to up(or down?)grade, which I installed,
and everything seems to work.
Still no success on Squeeze freezing on boot after booting into Windows 7 o=
n
a dual-boot machine. Boots fine after a full shut down; but cannot reboot
from Win7 to Squeeze. Methinks it has something to do with the ntfs
partition shared between both OS's? But Lenny never had trouble with it,
only after the upgrade to Squeeze has this become a problem.
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Camaleón <span \
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:noelamac@gmail.com">noelamac@gmail.com</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">
<br>
</div><a href="http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates" \
target="_blank">http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates</a><br> <br>
I've never used that repo before :-?<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>I hadn't either until I read it was the way to fix the \
disappearing mouse pointer issue in Squeeze, here <a \
href="http://hacksomethingtonight.blogspot.com/2011/04/invisible-mouse-pointer-in-debi \
an_19.html">http://hacksomethingtonight.blogspot.com/2011/04/invisible-mouse-pointer-in-debian_19.html</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Freeman <span \
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hewho7@gmail.com">hewho7@gmail.com</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br>
Run<br>
<br>
apt-cache policy<br>
<br>
If squeeze-proposed-updates is a priority of 100, it should update if<br>
necessary any of the packages installed without adding packages from that archive<br>
unless you manually install.<br>
<br>
If squeeze is a priority of 500, you might consider making squeeze your<br>
default in your /etc/apt/apt.conf file.<br>
<br>
As root:<br>
<br>
echo 'APT::Default-Release "stable";' >> \
/etc/apt/apt.conf<br></blockquote><div><br><br>Thank you Freeman, this is good to \
know.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Boyd \
Stephen Smith Jr. <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:bss@iguanasuicide.net">bss@iguanasuicide.net</a>></span> wrote:<br> \
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); \
margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im"><br>
>Am I supposed to keep the<br>
>proposed updates repos active in sources.list for the life of squeeze, or do<br>
>something else?<br>
<br>
</div>I wouldn't.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
>What if I comment it out now?<br>
<br>
</div>Run an update afterward and you should be fine. Some of your packages will<br>
have a newer version than is available on repositories configured for the<br>
system, but APT has no problem resolving that.<br></blockquote><div><br>Thank you, \
this is what I did, and apt found 3 packages after commenting out the \
squeeze-proposed-updates lines to up(or down?)grade, which I installed, and \
everything seems to work.<br> <br>Still no success on Squeeze freezing on boot after \
booting into Windows 7 on a dual-boot machine. Boots fine after a full shut down; \
but cannot reboot from Win7 to Squeeze. Methinks it has something to do with the \
ntfs partition shared between both OS's? But Lenny never had trouble with it, \
only after the upgrade to Squeeze has this become a problem.<br> \
</div></div></div></div></div></div>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTinQLRupXR85SrfE_O7utY78qO8raA@mail.gmail.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic