[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-user
Subject:    Re: backports updates
From:       Freeman <hewho7 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-05-15 21:51:00
Message-ID: 20110515215100.GB3375 () Deneb ! office
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:47:30PM -0700, evenso wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:05:29PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > According to the backports instructions site in order to get updates in
> > Lenny it's necessary to add pinning. There's another statement that
> > this isn't required for Squeeze. Does Squeeze backports get updated
> > along with the other repos via "apt-get update"?
> > 
> 
> My squeeze-backports priority drops to 100 without pinning, while squeeze is
> 990--apparently the /etc/apt/apt.conf Default-Release setting.
> 
> I believe 990 is necessary to prioritize a package above an equal version of
> the target release or the installed version.
> 

P.S.

I took out /etc/apt/apt.conf to double check. squeeze-backports remains at
100 but squeeze drops down to 500.

-- 
Regards,
Freeman

"Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is the
answer." --Somebody


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110515215100.GB3375@Deneb.office

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]