[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-user
Subject:    Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.
From:       Dave Thayer <debian0912423.dmthayer () recursor ! net>
Date:       2009-05-05 6:31:32
Message-ID: 20090505063132.GB22872 () thayer-boyle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> > Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
> > recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
> > reporting erroneous values?
> 
> I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results:
> 
> DVI:
> # xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
> default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
>    1280x1024      60.0*
>    1280x960       60.0
>    1152x864       60.0
>    1024x768       60.0
>    800x600        60.0     56.0
>    640x480        60.0
> 
> RGB:
> # xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600
> default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm
>    800x600        60.0*    56.0
>    640x480        60.0
>    400x300        60.0     56.0
>    320x240        60.0
> 

These look like the basic VESA resolutions. I wonder if you could
force any additional resolutions by adding custom modelines to your
xorg.conf file. 

dt

-- 
Dave Thayer           | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the 
Denver, Colorado USA  | author is right there, in the room talking to 
dave@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read 
                      | good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]