[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-hurd
Subject:    Re: Some issues on fresh installed Debian-Hurd
From:       Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault () gnu ! org>
Date:       2014-06-04 6:11:39
Message-ID: 20140604061139.GE4983 () type
[Download RAW message or body]

Justus Winter, le Mon 02 Jun 2014 12:22:36 +0200, a écrit :
> Quoting Jens Rehsack (2014-06-02 11:46:10)
> > Am 02.06.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>:
> > 
> > > Quoting Jens Rehsack (2014-06-02 10:58:17)
> > >> Am 02.06.2014 um 10:47 schrieb Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>:
> > >> 
> > >>> Hi :)
> > >>> 
> > >>> Quoting Jens Rehsack (2014-06-02 08:28:50)
> > >>> 
> > >>>> Beside the kernel choice the installation went smoothly (a problem
> > >>>> Debian-Hurd shares with Debian-kFreeBSD ^^).
> > >>> 
> > >>> I don't follow.
> > >> 
> > >> I most likely pebcak :)
> > >> Generally it's (for me) poorly documented which kernel is meant by hurd-1 vs. hurd-1.3.nnn
> > >> I got it later by doing apt-cache search (but initial boot was with 1.3.nnn)
> > > 
> > > I still don't follow.  Hurd is not a kernel.  There is no package hurd-1 or hurd-1.3.nnn.
> > 
> > Ok - what I was talking about (and I'm sure the installer named it kernel or with a similar term) was
> > 
> > gnumach-image-1.3.99-486 vs. gnumach-image-1.4-486
> 
> Fair enough.  Gnumach is our kernel allright.  I wonder why 1.3.99 is
> still available.  Samuel?

Remember that he installed from the 2013 image, so that kernel got
installed, before installing the 1.4 version on upgrade, and Debian
doesn't remove old kernels. Grub should have put them in the 1.4 then
1.3.99 order, though.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140604061139.GE4983@type

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]