[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-devel
Subject: Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped
From: Thibaut Paumard <thibaut () debian ! org>
Date: 2018-02-15 12:19:50
Message-ID: 6e2441e5-b1aa-f2f6-4630-fb7ca72df39d () debian ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
(Please follow-up to debian-curiosa)
Le 15/02/2018 à 11:41, Simon McVittie a écrit :
>
> We don't have to look far to find a weird versioning scheme that can't
> be represented without epochs: our largest competitor in the field of
> general-purpose operating systems has such a versioning scheme. Imagine
> we had a package that followed the same versioning scheme as Windows (I
> could imagine a parallel universe in which Wine used the version number
> of the version of Windows that it claims to emulate). If we packaged
> that, using the "marketing version" wherever it's numeric or making up
> something reasonable wherever it isn't, we might have had a versioning
> scheme like this:
Well, as it happens, all the Windows versions also have a number that
sorts properly, but does not always match the commercial number:
>
> 3.1
> 3.11
> 95
4.00
> 98
4.10
> 2000
NT 5.0 (which we could have translated as 5.0+NT, for instance)
> 1:5.1+XP # or 2001+XP or something
NT 5.1 (5.1+NT)
> 1:5.2+Vista # or 2006+Vista or something
NT 6.0
> 1:7
Funnily, this is NT 6.1!
> 1:8
NT 6.2
> 1:8.1
NT 6.3
> 1:10
NT 10.0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_Windows_versions
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic