[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: New package, name recycling
From:       Adam Borowski <kilobyte () angband ! pl>
Date:       2017-10-23 0:20:07
Message-ID: 20171023002007.a54lqosokz4rydpf () angband ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> FAOD: although "." is legal in package names, I agree that it should
> not be used here.  We don't want to embed upstream's domain names in
> our package names because the former have a very short lifespan (!)
> - often much shorter than the lifespan of a Debian package.

Yeah, it's a terrible idea.  But there's something nasty I can tell you
about what appears to be a set of packages implementing golang's interfaces
to github...

-- 
⢀⣴� �� �⢶⣦� � Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. 
⣾� �⢰� �� �⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift
⢿⡄� �� �� �� �� � or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters
� �� �⣄� �� �� �� � relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]