[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    New package, name recycling
From:       "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle () debian ! org>
Date:       2017-10-20 14:59:58
Message-ID: 20171020165958.Horde.eX2QKy6Gs2V53cR0NOb4tJw () webmail ! in-berlin ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

just to be sure, that this is not a problem:

There used to be a package "dino" in Debian until jessie.  Upstream
development dried up years ago and dino became extinct.

Recently, a new "dino" appeared on the surface of earth, which is a
completely different program. Like git vs git or node vs node, but
with only one contender.

I would package the new dino under this name, because I don't think
there is a conflict.

Any objections?

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic