[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    openssl transition
From:       Jörg_Frings-Fürst <debian () jff-webhosting ! net>
Date:       2016-10-27 10:40:21
Message-ID: 1477564821.7930.9.camel () jff-webhosting ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


Hello,

I have read the discussion about the openssl transition here again. 

One of the last notes was to be used openssl 1.0 and 1.1 in parallel
because of the non-trivial changes.

So I have some questions:

- The parallel use of release 1.0 and 1.1 will not be pursued?

- Why is the transition started with 0 (zero) good packages (from 552)?

- Should it be safer to switch to a new API at short notice and
under    pressure? 


CU
Jörg
-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB    30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key                : 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser

Threema: SYR8SJXB

IRC: j_f-f@freenode.net
          j_f-f@oftc.net

My wish list:  
  - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic