[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-devel
Subject: openssl transition
From: Jörg_Frings-Fürst <debian () jff-webhosting ! net>
Date: 2016-10-27 10:40:21
Message-ID: 1477564821.7930.9.camel () jff-webhosting ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Hello,
I have read the discussion about the openssl transition here again.
One of the last notes was to be used openssl 1.0 and 1.1 in parallel
because of the non-trivial changes.
So I have some questions:
- The parallel use of release 1.0 and 1.1 will not be pursued?
- Why is the transition started with 0 (zero) good packages (from 552)?
- Should it be safer to switch to a new API at short notice and
under pressure?
CU
Jörg
--
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key : 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56
Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).
Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser
Threema: SYR8SJXB
IRC: j_f-f@freenode.net
j_f-f@oftc.net
My wish list:
- Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic