[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?
From:       Jakub Wilk <jwilk () debian ! org>
Date:       2015-09-19 11:12:33
Message-ID: 20150919111233.GB919 () jwilk ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

* peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>, 2015-09-19, 06:29:
>>The unusual problems with the g++-5 transition are:
>Another big one is the descision was taken NOT to change the sonames 
>when making sub-transitions. I presume this was done to avoid deviating 
>from upstream sonmaes

I don't think this is the reason. We don't change SONAMEs because it's a 
huge pain for maintainers. (Has anyone figured a straight-forward way to 
append arbitrary suffix to SONAME for packages that use libtool?)

-- 
Jakub Wilk

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]