[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-devel
Subject: Re: Not depending on shlibs because of plugins?
From: Mattia Dongili <malattia () linux ! it>
Date: 2007-01-05 17:48:04
Message-ID: 20070105174804.GG13533 () inferi ! kami ! home
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:37:56PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm packaging a database wrapper library (http://oss.devit.com/yada/).
> Its purpose is to provide one single API to a program and let the user
> configure if the database used is actually postgres/mysql/sqlite. The
> actual interfacing with the databases is done by .so plugins that are
> dlopened at run time.
>
> Currently my package will depend on all of the database libs:
>
> | Depends: [...], libmysqlclient15off (>= 5.0.24-2), libpq4 (>= 8.1.4), libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.3.8)
>
> This kind of defeats the purpose of the package, the program(mer) uses
> this library in order not to pull in any (or even all) specific
> databases.
>
> Is it in this case ok if I replace ',' by '|' there? This would allow
> the user to really choose what database backend he wants.
Yes, why not? does yada handles gracefully the absence of a library (eg.
if incorrectly configured or such)?
If so did you consider:
Depends: A | B | C
Reccomends/Suggests: A, B, C
would that work?
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic