[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages
From:       Matthias Klose <doko () cs ! tu-berlin ! de>
Date:       2006-06-13 8:07:16
Message-ID: 17550.29236.921092.718621 () gargle ! gargle ! HOWL
[Download RAW message or body]

martin f krafft writes:
> also sprach Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> [2006.06.13.0149 +0200]:
> >  - The current pythonX.Y-foo packages having modules in the python
> >    library path are collapsed into one package python-foo. Binary
> >    independent modules are made available for the python versions
> >    currently supported in the distribution.  Binary dependent
> >    extensions are put for all supported python versions into the
> >    same python-foo package.  The overhead for a maybe unused
> 
> Python will create optimised, binary dependent modules on first
> access to .py files, right? In our case, though, this fails because
> /usr is mostly read-only to those running Python.
> 
> Couldn't Python be extended to store .pyc files in /var?

how would that be different? make that directory in /var world
writable?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]