[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-devel
Subject: Re: Bug#366834: ITP: cxxtools -- library of unrelated, but useful C++ classes
From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter () debian ! org>
Date: 2006-05-12 10:36:13
Message-ID: 20060512103613.GD10192 () country ! grep ! be
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> wrote:
> > Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral?
>
> Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has created the LGPL because
> of this.
Actually, they don't. They consider the GPL a perfectly valid license
for a library; however, they also consider that in some cases, it *may*
be better to use the LGPL instead. Just not all of them.
Why do you think they
* Never released libreadline under anything else than the GPL,
* Renamed the LGPL from the "Library GPL" to the "Lesser GPL"?
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic