[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: Dummy packages and metapackages (call for consistency in thedescriptions)
From:       Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16 () alu ! ua ! es>
Date:       2005-10-30 16:28:35
Message-ID: 20051030162835.GA14605 () chistera ! yi ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

* Andreas Tille [Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:23:20 +0100]:

> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Adeodato [iso-8859-1] Simó wrote:

> > Would it be unreasonable to ask that metapackages have to be _empty_,
> > i.e., that all their functionality it's in their control file?

> As long as you give no reasons to do so I would in deed call it
> unreasonable.

  Dude, the second paragraph on my mail contains an example.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
    Listening to: Franz Ferdinand - Eleanor Put Your Boots On
 
Ara que ets la meva dona, te la fotré fins a la melsa, bacona!
                -- Borja Álvaro a Miranda Boronat en «Chulas y famosas»


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]