[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
From:       Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16 () alu ! ua ! es>
Date:       2005-08-19 10:48:12
Message-ID: 20050819104812.GB10801 () chistera ! yi ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

* martin f krafft [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:54:45 +0200]:

> I oppose to this ITP for the single reason that CVS should be faded
> out and its users starved and deprived and forced towards SVN and
> bazaar! Har har har!

  I don't see opencvs failing to meet any of the requirements of Policy
  2.2.1, or other common-sense criteria that is usually applied to ITPs
  in this list, so I think this ITP can go on.

  I'm told on IRC that the above was meant as a personal opinion. I
  think it'd would've been nice to point that out; perhaps others
  disagree, but "I oppose to this ITP" seems like strong wording to me.

* martin f krafft [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:41:16 +0200]:

> So instead of preparing the package, I suggest investing the time to
> migrate projects from CVS to SVN or bazaar instead.

  FWIW, that "instead of" is killing me, but perhaps it's just me being
  overly sensitive this morning. Please excuse me.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
The problem I have with making an intelligent statement is that some
people then think that it's not an isolated occurrance.
                -- Simon Travaglia


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]