[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    packages.d.o mail (Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please)
From:       Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16 () alu ! ua ! es>
Date:       2005-06-23 14:14:30
Message-ID: 20050623141430.GA9351 () chistera ! yi ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

* Andreas Barth [Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:54:29 +0200]:

> The packages.d.o-addresses are a really useful tool for contacting
> multiple maintainers e.g. for transitions. They were quite helpful
> during e.g. the release of sarge.

  There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that
  both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address
  requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header to let a message
  reach <package>@p.q.d.o, but I never asked Frank what his plans about
  this wrt the merge were.

  If @packages.d.o addresses are really such a big source of spam, we
  could require the header for both domains, which isn't _that_
  disruptive if we assume most users of @p.d.o addresses are developers,
  and not end users.

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
The Wright Brothers weren't the first to fly. They were just the first
not to crash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]