[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-devel
Subject: Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
From: Roland Stigge <stigge () antcom ! de>
Date: 2004-08-10 9:50:50
Message-ID: 1092131450.13104.19.camel () atari ! stigge ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
you wrote:
> If rebuilding a platform independent binary from source is a policy
> requirement, I'd appreciate a pointer to the relevant text.
I addition to Adam Majers summary, some more points:
>From the Policy:
===========================================================================
2.1. The Debian Free Software Guidelines:
[...]
Source Code
The program must include source code, and must allow distribution
in source code as well as compiled form.
===========================================================================
"source code as well as compiled form" shouldn't mean: "Possibly source
code form, but in this case you also need the binaries at first."
===========================================================================
4.8. Main building script: `debian/rules'
This file must be an executable makefile, and contains the
package-specific recipes for compiling the package and building binary
package(s) from the source.
[...]
===========================================================================
It is not explicitly stated if the latter means "source package" or
"source code" (point for clarification in Policy?), but since it talks
about "source package" at other places, this could be a piece of
circumstantial evidence that "source code" is meant.
Also consider the hassles we come into when we need to patch upstream
sources; and reliably and automatically checking if packages build from
source.
bye,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic