[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge
From:       Steve Langasek <vorlon () debian ! org>
Date:       2004-07-23 10:10:54
Message-ID: 20040723101051.GL631 () quetzlcoatl ! dodds ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:47:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-07-23 martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> wrote:
> > also sprach Grzegorz B. Prokopski <gadek@debian.org> [2004.07.23.0319 +0200]:
> > > I don't have the URL at hand but some people expressed exactly the
> > > same hopes just before Woody release.  I wasn't around (yet) when
> > > when potato was being released but I guess it might have been
> > > similarly.

> > Sure. But for Sarge, we did have the goal of a new installer and
> > that took a long time. Right now, I don't seem to recall any equally
> > big release goals for sarge+1
> [...]

> The obvious big blocker is the non-free "data|doc" issue. *Personally*
> I do not *think* we currently have a consensus in Debian about this,
> *IMHO* we have just agreed to delay the problem post-sarge.[1]

The results of the last GR rather explicitly show that the changes to
the Social Contract would be put into effect following sarge's release.
Given the variety of options on the ballot and the fact that this option
required a 3:1 supermajority to pass, I think that constitutes a
consensus for the project's purposes.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]