[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-devel
Subject: Re: Bits from the RM
From: Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith () globetrotter ! net>
Date: 2003-12-05 1:46:19
[Download RAW message or body]
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:38:10AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote on debian-devel-announce:
> >
> > > I think the best way is to
> > > file a RFA (which we're redefining as "Request For Assistance" instead
> > > of just "Request For Adoption") report against wnpp
> > [cut]
> > > Third, personnel deployment. As a complement to the "Request For
> > > Assistance" stuff, we're also creating a new wnpp heading, OTA for
> > > "Offer To Assist".
> >
> > Will http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ be modified to reflect these new
> > tags? (When it's official I'll modify debian-bug.el)
>
> It is simple to do this and I also offered to do it for another proposal
> one day before the compromise. When I regain CVS access I can/will take
> care of it.
Thanks!
Anyone know the answer to my second question?
: Does the OTA bug get filled against the package you are offering to help
: with, or against wnpp? I presume against the package you are offering
: to help with, but then there's no easy way to see where help is offered
: overall.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic