[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: Question about libcdda_paranoia
From:       Henning Moll <newsScott () gmx ! de>
Date:       2003-10-08 14:58:34
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:27, Colin Watson wrote:
> No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking, and
> therefore live in development packages.

Thank you for that information!

But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b. 
This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But 
that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed. 
This would mean a dependency to a development package. 
Is this a bug in k3b? Should k3b try to dlopen 'libcdda_paranoia.so.0' 
instead? Is there a standard for so-naming (which is respected by all/
most Gnu/Linux distributions)?

Where can i learn more about the naming of share object files?

Thanks in advance!
Henning


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]