[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan
From:       Chris Cheney <ccheney () cheney ! cx>
Date:       2003-08-02 19:16:25
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:15:53PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman said:
> >I disagree.  If I'm not mistaken, this is the definition of an RC bug. 
>  >If
> >the package has an RC bug, it is not releasable.  If there is an RC bug
> >which does not imply that the package is unreleasable, it has been 
> >assigned
> >the wrong severity.
> 
> So you're saying bug #196564 should be downgraded then?  I don't think 
> that *possibly* causing a segfault in another package (it's not clear 
> that it still does), on *one* architecture (m68k), when it's *probably* 
> a toolchain issue, and the m68k people don't have the time or interest 
> to reproduce it or track it down, should imply that the package is 
> unreleasable!

I am about to be closing 196564 since it does not seem to be
reproducable, meinproc is used in every kde app during the build process
and it is working.

Thanks,

Chris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]