[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: packages tasksel expects to find in woody, that arn't there
From:       Yven Leist <leist () beldesign ! de>
Date:       2002-03-11 0:25:33
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 26 February 2002 04:15, Joey Hess wrote:
> Tasksel expects to find a bunch of packages in woody that arn't there.
> This is not often a big deal; the missing packages will be silently
> skipped. That can sorta suck if it is one of the core packages in the
> task though.
[...]
>
> No mueller7-dict!
>
> 	Has rc bugs, and updates-excuses implies it is in the process of
> 	being removed.

I do have a rather dumb question concerning the mueller package: I intend to 
adopt it and already retitled the bug, but now I'm not sure whether it makes 
sense to do an upload, since the rc bugs seem to be resolved and 
update_excuses only says: Too young, only 9 of 10 days old, (according to 
madison there is no version of mueller in testing at all);
so will the package go into woody despite the fact that it has  "Debian QA 
Group" as maintainer?  
Would it be enough to simply close the retitled ITA bug, or should I do a 
regular upload (setting myself as the maintainer of course)?
Thanks for any input on this.
Regards,
Yven

-- 

Yven Johannes Leist - leist@beldesign.de
http://www.leist.beldesign.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]