--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:04:54AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> remember:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.ht=
ml
>=20
> well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
> chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
> chrooting bind should be a debconf option of the bind9 package, or
> whether i could create such a pseudo package, which would chroot an
> existing installation. i tend for the package just because it's modular,
> but Bdale said he'd want this functionality in the main package.

I vote yes for the Debconfy bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it
insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security
problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something.=20

--=20
Daniel Stone						    <daniel@sfarc.net>
<wolfie> who needs a girlfriend
<wolfie> i have a tamagotchi

--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjxDjm8ACgkQcPClnTztfv0z4ACfd7MRs35zzsfFm4xBpECcChC6
kP8An2GuyVV/JgnPJJBDKqB8DCA9MO0H
=UzHf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org