[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: Question regarding black-box and testing
From:       Josip Rodin <joy () cibalia ! gkvk ! hr>
Date:       2001-12-18 18:19:04
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:52:03AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:53:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Could anyone explain why update_excuses [1] doesn't mention black-box?
> > According to packages.debian.org [2] it's in unstable but not in testing,
> 
> packages.debian.org is not authoritative, and often not particularly
> accurate.
> 
> black-box |    1.4.5-1 |       testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, \
> m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

It's unfair to say it's often not particularly accurate! It currently just
happens not to have black-box in the Packages file that it acquired from
mirrors.kernel.org -- it's not packages.d.o's fault that the http.us.d.o
mirror that's closest to it is having issues.

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]