[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       darcs-users
Subject:    Re: [darcs-users] Re: Should darcs obliterate fail?
From:       Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek () pps ! jussieu ! fr>
Date:       2006-02-27 21:10:57
Message-ID: 7ibqws5wym.fsf () lanthane ! pps ! jussieu ! fr
[Download RAW message or body]

James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

> Interestingly, this was from several months ago, and "darcs get"
> doesn't notice any problem for some reason (maybe that's an issue
> worth looking into).

No, it's normal.  Darcs tries to makes local get as fast as possible,
so it simply copies files around.  Darcs users tend to create
short-lived branches quite a lot.

> I guess it's a best practice to run "darcs repair" reasonably
> frequently to check for problems before they get worse by propagating
> through later patches.

I run ``darcs check'' just before logging out.

                                        Juliusz

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic