[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: darcs-users
Subject: Re: [darcs-users] Re: Should darcs obliterate fail?
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek () pps ! jussieu ! fr>
Date: 2006-02-27 21:10:57
Message-ID: 7ibqws5wym.fsf () lanthane ! pps ! jussieu ! fr
[Download RAW message or body]
James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> Interestingly, this was from several months ago, and "darcs get"
> doesn't notice any problem for some reason (maybe that's an issue
> worth looking into).
No, it's normal. Darcs tries to makes local get as fast as possible,
so it simply copies files around. Darcs users tend to create
short-lived branches quite a lot.
> I guess it's a best practice to run "darcs repair" reasonably
> frequently to check for problems before they get worse by propagating
> through later patches.
I run ``darcs check'' just before logging out.
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic