[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       darcs-users
Subject:    Re: [darcs-users] Re: cache-name-proposal
From:       Juliusz Chroboczek <jch () pps ! jussieu ! fr>
Date:       2005-01-23 22:51:39
Message-ID: tpfz0rbvyc.fsf () lanthane ! pps ! jussieu ! fr
[Download RAW message or body]

> We could also consider changing it in the _darcs directory, at least
> for current.none, the new format.  Since _darcs/current/ is only
> used locally, it might not even be too bad to change its name to
> _darcs/pristine, with appropriate code to try _darcs/current if
> _darcs/pristine doesn't exist (or the other way around).

Wouldn't that break when people use old darcs to pull from new repos?

> It seems at the moment that pristine is getting the most votes, with
> current only slightly behind.

Having expressed their doleances, the unwashed masses are waiting for
the benevolent dictator to take a decision ;-)

                                        Juliusz


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic