[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cyrus-devel
Subject: Re: ANNOTATEMORE => METADATA and rfc 5464
From: Martin Konold <martin.konold () erfrakon ! de>
Date: 2009-11-17 12:37:47
Message-ID: 200911171337.47671.martin.konold () erfrakon ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 13:28:49 Bron Gondwana wrote:
Hi,
> to everything were changed and the commands were renamed. It would
> be great to be complient, and there is software out there like Kolab
> which would benefit from it.
>
> Also, the database format is pretty nasty - complete with nulls
> embedded in keys and other fun stuff (like platform dependent type
> lengths codified in the format, ick)
>
> So I'm thinking: create a new metadata.db, require a conversion on upgrade
> from annotations.db. I had a look, and none of our servers had ANY
> annotations until I added a /comment to my INBOX for testing.
>
> Does anybody out there use annotations much? Does anybody know any code
> that would be broken by changing the way annotations are done?
Yes, Kolab makes heavy/critical use of annotations. Provided there is a
suitable upgrade path I am fully in favour of moving towards rfc 5464.
Yours,
-- martin
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic