[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cypherpunks
Subject: Re: opennic is safe ?
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen () freedbms ! net>
Date: 2017-08-29 6:17:42
Message-ID: 20170829061742.lzcxkvqavwhyh7yi () eye ! freedbms ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:27:25PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40:05AM +0800, James A. Donald wrote:
> > On 2017-08-29 07:31, juan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800
> > > "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by
> > > > enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn,
> > > > they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis,
> > >
> > > how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called
> > > 'hidden' services?
> >
> > After Stormfront was shut down, it was recreated on a tor hidden service, which \
> > was then throttled down to unusuability.
>
> It is possible that Weev does not actually know that it takes at
> least a few days, and really a few weeks, to build up a Tor-network
> profile whereby other nodes and willing to accept significant traffic
> from the new node - this is my understanding of how Tor relays work.
>
> It is of course also possible that there is an intended and targetted
> clampdown on TDS.
>
> But the first step is to grok how Tor works, and eliminate such a
> possibility.
>
> Ultimately, Tor has a crippled TCP underlying protocol/comms layer -
> a new UDP (or even lower) protocol layer is ultimately needed so that
> a free speech network becomes a proper switched network. But that's
> another of those things that Tor "strangely" keeps failing to get
> funding for...
s/Weev/the admin for stormfront/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic