[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cygwin-xfree
Subject:    Re: making X server a COM object..
From:       Randall R Schulz <rrschulz () cris ! com>
Date:       2003-03-31 23:58:22
[Download RAW message or body]

Harold,

At 15:50 2003-03-31, you wrote:
>KH,
>
>The scope is probably beyond the scope of this mailing list.
>
>I think you would be better off working first on a version of 
>Cygwin/XFree86 that compiled without Cygwin... then, and only then, 
>could you even begin to worry about wrapping XFree86 with a COM interface.

Cygwin /XFree86 without Cygwin is Win32/XFree86, or some such, is it not?

It always seemed to me that the target specifier ought to come after 
the main program name: XFree86/Cygwin, XFree86/Win32, etc.


>Harold

Randall Schulz 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]