[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cygwin
Subject:    Re: Windows 95 support ?
From:       Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please () cygwin ! com>
Date:       2006-04-25 23:43:54
Message-ID: 20060425234354.GB22965 () trixie ! casa ! cgf ! cx
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:04:40AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Christopher Faylor, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 14:05:54 -0400, a ?crit :
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:01:49PM +0000, g.r.vansickle@xxxxx wrote:
                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
tsk, tsk.

This really is a losing battle isn't it?

>> >Setup.exe or msvc.dll?  I guess either way, cygcheck should tell you.
>> 
>> Maybe not:
>
>Cygcheck returns
>
>.\setup.exe
>  C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\KERNEL32.DLL
>  C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\ADVAPI32.DLL
>  C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\COMCTL32.DLL
>    C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\GDI32.dll
>    C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\USER32.dll
>  C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\msvcrt.dll
>  C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\OLE32.dll
>    C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\MSVCRT20.dll
>    C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\RPCRT4.dll
>  C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\SHELL32.DLL
>  C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\WSOCK32.DLL

So since cygcheck works, that would tend to suggest that msvcrt.dll is
at least somewhat operational.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]