[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cryptography
Subject:    Re: [Cryptography] GCHQ's plan to backdoor encrypted phone calls
From:       Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab ! com>
Date:       2016-01-20 14:42:12
Message-ID: 569F9CC4.8070003 () mykolab ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 1/19/2016 7:03 PM, Henry Baker wrote:

> FYI -- The whole article is too long to reproduce here; follow the
> link to read the whole article.
> 
> https://www.benthamsgaze.org/2016/01/19/insecure-by-design-protocols-f
or-encrypted-phone-calls/
>
>  Insecure by design: protocols for encrypted phone calls
> 
> The MIKEY-SAKKE protocol is being promoted by the UK government as
> a better way to secure phone calls. The reality is that MIKEY-SAKKE
> is designed to offer minimal security while allowing undetectable
> mass surveillance, through the introduction a backdoor based around
> mandatory key-escrow. This weakness has implications which go
> further than just the security of phone calls.
> 

[...]

Also seen here:

https://www.onthewire.io/uk-voice-encryption-standard-built-for-key-escr
ow-surveillance/

FYI,

- - ferg


- -- 
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlafnMQACgkQKJasdVTchbIJLwEAx9XOM6Fw8irBiQMFDpWpSvWj
Ez0GdruZrHyKCM/L95IA/2/ttvoXptMnTj1sFZ1c7FJAdVnxu+6nziER3TNXLjmT
=E/rO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]