[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cryptography
Subject:    Re: [Cryptography] RC4 and SHA2
From:       Tony Arcieri <bascule () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-08-27 21:07:27
Message-ID: CAHOTMVLYM=gYxY=xPPMpGSF_4LTPC0WrrRsbULvBHoT73vEyJw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Hubert A. Le Van Gong <hubert@levangong.org
> wrote:

> Are there any cryptographic reasons that would forbid a (TLS) ciphersuite
> to combine RC4 and a SHA2 MAC?
>

Don't use broken crypto.

Note: I do know RC4 is being deprecated so this is purely a theoretical
> question.


I don't care. Don't use broken crypto!

-- 
Tony Arcieri

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 \
at 8:18 AM, Hubert A. Le Van Gong <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:hubert@levangong.org" \
target="_blank">hubert@levangong.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">Are there any cryptographic reasons that would forbid a (TLS) \
ciphersuite to combine RC4 and a SHA2 \
MAC?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Don&#39;t use broken crypto.  \
</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Note: I do know RC4 is being \
deprecated so this is purely a theoretical \
question.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don&#39;t care. Don&#39;t use broken \
crypto!</div><div>  </div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Tony \
Arcieri<br></div> </div></div>


[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]