[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cryptography
Subject:    Re: [Cryptography] Vulns of social/freedom initiatives, NSA 0wn3d CPUs, BTC, Infra and Politic
From:       Lodewijk_andré_de_la_porte <l () odewijk ! nl>
Date:       2015-04-09 13:30:14
Message-ID: CAHWD2rLoXM+WUcg8gBq8miFpkpjiTwZZ-NHdeQc7O8wL+aKV9Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


I've been pondering Intel's chips for a while now. It was what made me
decide against making a Bitcoin wallet service. Since my decision a slew of
services inferior to what I had failed for various reasons. Can't say what
would've happened, if I had proceeded.

Is there any evidence for or against the Intel chip exploits? (Other than
"They could do it, and why wouldn't they?")
Is there any reason to expect AMD to be any better?
What about (certain?) ARM chips?
What about MediaTek?

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">I&#39;ve been pondering Intel&#39;s chips for \
a while now. It was what made me decide against making a Bitcoin wallet service. \
Since my decision a slew of services inferior to what I had failed for various \
reasons. Can&#39;t say what would&#39;ve happened, if I had proceeded.<br></div><div \
class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Is there any evidence for or \
against the Intel chip exploits? (Other than &quot;They could do it, and why \
wouldn&#39;t they?&quot;)</div><div class="gmail_extra">Is there any reason to expect \
AMD to be any better?</div><div class="gmail_extra">What about (certain?) ARM \
chips?<br>What about MediaTek?</div></div>



_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]