[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cryptography
Subject:    Re: Mifare
From:       Thor Lancelot Simon <tls () rek ! tjls ! com>
Date:       2008-07-14 14:42:23
Message-ID: 20080714144222.GA9010 () panix ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 02:41:29PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> 
> Now everyone is going to say it should have been put out for review, and 
> of course it should have been, and had they done so they would have 
> avoided these particular mistakes, but DNSSEC and WPA was reviewed to 
> hell and back, and the result was still no damned good.

Really?  From a cryptographic -- not a political -- point of view, what
exactly is wrong with DNSSEC or WPA?

WPA certainly seems to be quite widely deployed.

-- 
Thor Lancelot Simon	                                   tls@rek.tjls.com
 "My guess is that the minimal training typically provided would only
 have given the party in question multiple new and elaborate ways to do
 something incomprehensibly stupid and dangerous."	-Rich Goldstone

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]