[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: crux
Subject: Re: Would like new functionality in ports.
From: Florian Weber <Florian.Weber () pfaffenhofen ! de>
Date: 2002-06-25 8:25:55
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 24 June 2002 21:32, Per Lidén wrote:
> What do you contrib-maintainers think of this? Would people actually
> bother to set up their own cvs/cvsup servers (except Magnus that is)?
I would, although I'll have to find a suitable server first.
> If anyone has strong feelings about this (either because they think it
> would be great or because they think it would suck) then please let
> me know.
I'd like to second that idea, it's extremely valuable to have more than one
source of packets.
Florian
- --
PGP key ID: 3C4E74DC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9GCkWm8fasDxOdNwRAlhdAKC910V01LKGU2iqkxm09R+/gzD+iACcDKHu
EmdWBTyRwjVrgKmzN1grgDM=
=7CFR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic