[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       clamav-devel
Subject:    Re: [Clamav-devel] ClamAV performance improvements (6x-10x)
From:       Tomasz Kojm <tkojm () clamav ! net>
Date:       2004-12-09 17:52:51
Message-ID: 20041209185251.71b72ad9 () Wierszokleta ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:33:00 -0800
Ozgun Erdogan <ozgune@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's a paper draft that discusses our approach with tons of
> performance data (and it's an easy read):
> 
> http://raconsoft.com/products/opensource/hash-av.pdf

This paper compares HashAV to some outdated version of ClamAV.
Scalability and efficiency of the ClamAV engine was significantly
improved in August, 2004. Serious publications _must_ include details on
tested software versions.

> What do ClamAV developers think? What would be the pros and cons of
> running HashAV?

Please include a comparison/description of the 0.80 release of ClamAV.
More detailed test on other architectures would also be appreciated.

Best regards,

-- 
   oo    .....         Tomasz Kojm <tkojm@clamav.net>
  (\/)\.........         http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
     \..........._         0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
       //\   /\              Thu Dec  9 18:52:48 CET 2004

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]