[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ckrm-tech
Subject:    Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 1/4] CKRM rewrite without classtype
From:       MAEDA Naoaki <maeda.naoaki () jp ! fujitsu ! com>
Date:       2005-09-20 13:24:37
Message-ID: 43300D95.8090008 () jp ! fujitsu ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Chandra Seetharaman wrote:

> Currently, core just fails the creation of a class if a resource
> controller fails to create its part. The reason being that it will be
> confusing to the user to see a specific resource at one level and not at
> a lower level.
> 
> Here are the options we have and i want to know what others feel:
> 
> 1. Leave the current behavior.
> 2. If a resource controller returns NULL, proceed with the core class
> creation and return the class if there is at least one resource in that
> class.
> 3. Use res_hdepth and fail class creation if the depth is higher than
> res_hdepth.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> chandra 

We should keep f0 series CKRM core as simple as possible, so I prefer
option 1 with removing res_hdepth member from struct ckrm_res_ctlr.

In addition, since three or four level is enough for any practical
usage, the maximum level of resource controlleres would be quite
similar number.

Thanks,
MAEDA Naoaki




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]