[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-voip
Subject:    Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade Analysis for CUCM 8.5(1) to 8.6(2a), 9.0(1), or 9.1(1a)
From:       "Erick B." <erickbee () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-04-24 19:52:51
Message-ID: CAHSnBQwCyBzsmSxkg09YdWx_BF-h_tHyBp1MavB=080LeUhLjw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


I've done a upgrade from 8.5.1 to 9.1.1a with no issues. Licensing is
different as you know, but basically installed the refresh_upgrade cop file
then did the 9.1.1 upgrade file and booted on new version and went fine.
VM's are on UCS B as well. Separate ELM server.  Upgrade from 8.5.1 to
9.1.1 did not take much longer than a normal 8.5 SU took. For our setup,
that is about 1.5 hr to 2 hrs for publisher install and 1 hour for each
subscriber. The switch version for each server took 20-30 minutes to
complete per server.




On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dave Wolgast <dwolgas1@rochester.rr.com>wrote:

> Has anyone done any analysis like this that they would be willing to
> share? We are trying to determine upgrade complexity among these 3 options,
> considering licensing, any upgrade caveats, and potential user-facing
> changes. We'll be performing the potential upgrade on UCS-B platforms, and
> essentially, we need to choose one of these options to maintain UCCE
> compatibility, while keeping disruption to a minimum.
>
> --
> Dave Wolgast
> Livonia, NY
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">I&#39;ve done a upgrade from 8.5.1 to 9.1.1a with no issues. Licensing \
is different as you know, but basically installed the refresh_upgrade cop file then \
did the 9.1.1 upgrade file and booted on new version and went fine. VM&#39;s are on \
UCS B as well. Separate ELM server.  Upgrade from 8.5.1 to 9.1.1 did not take much \
longer than a normal 8.5 SU took. For our setup, that is about 1.5 hr to 2 hrs for \
publisher install and 1 hour for each subscriber. The switch version for each server \
took 20-30 minutes to complete per server. <div> <br></div><div \
style><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On \
Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dave Wolgast <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:dwolgas1@rochester.rr.com" \
target="_blank">dwolgas1@rochester.rr.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span \
style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Has anyone done any analysis like \
this that they would be willing to share? We are trying to determine upgrade \
complexity among these 3 options, considering licensing, any upgrade caveats, and \
potential user-facing changes. We&#39;ll be performing the potential upgrade on UCS-B \
platforms, and essentially, we need to choose one of these options to maintain UCCE \
compatibility, while keeping disruption to a minimum.</span><span \
class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br clear="all">

<div><br></div>-- <br>Dave Wolgast<br>Livonia, NY

</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" \
target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br> \
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]