[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-voip
Subject:    Re: [cisco-voip] H.323 vs MGCPGW
From:       "Bill Riley" <bill () hitechconnection ! net>
Date:       2010-12-30 23:08:21
Message-ID: 000001cba876$758f8b60$60aea220$ () net
[Download RAW message or body]

I would be curious to know why you are moving away from H.323 to MGCP. 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of cisco.voip
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:32 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] H.323 vs MGCPGW

All,
On my current H323 gateway to a provider, I set the station-id and 
station number via the router config.
This presents a single id and number to the CCM phones callerid display.

Now I am converting to MGCP GW via PRi and I want to tag the incoming 
Caller ID and Name to a single name/number same as the H323 GW?
But I do not see how to do it via ccm 7.1.2?

I am using CCM 7.1.2 and 2800 series VGW's?

Is there something I can set on the serial interface to set a similiar 
station-id/number on a MGCP GW?

TIA.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]