[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCME in multiple sites
From: "Turpin, Mark" <mark.turpin () calence ! com>
Date: 2007-07-31 20:25:05
Message-ID: B5BD433C4A22AE449EB1D65DDD9F7B0D011D9338 () PHXML02 ! calence ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
You don't need callmanager to make this work. You can easily integrate
the two CCME's together.
The SRND for CCME covers this exact topic here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps4625/products_implement
ation_design_guide_chapter09186a00805f083a.html
Good luck with the sale!
-Mark
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Curt Shaffer
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:19 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCME in multiple sites
I have a client who I am working with on a voice solution. They have two
offices. As of now they are connected via site to site VPN for Active
Directory, CRM and mail exchange. The office here is small, only 25
employees. There is no plan for major growth any time in the foreseeable
future. Their remote office is very, very small. Only 5 employees. Both
offices will remain functional but major employee growth is not expected
in either. My question is this...is it possible for them just to do CCME
in both offices with the ability of on net calls to each other via SIP
trunk or will they need to go to Call Manager? I think Call Manager
pricing will make this deal fall through in this case but I don't want
to push them to something where they are going to loose the benefits of
interconnection. The dial plans can/will be different, each will have
PSTN for local calling in their respective areas, and separate
directories will be fine because of the fact that business in each
location is technically local to that office for the most part. Also how
scalable can this solution be if say they wanted to consolidate some of
their long distance calling via the central office here if that is even
possible. Will the costs of just doing Call Manager now be just as
effective as installing/maintaining two CCME systems? Anyone have a good
doc that addresses this decision making process?
Thanks
Curt
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" \
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" \
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" \
xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" \
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>You don’t need callmanager to make this work. You can \
easily integrate the two CCME’s together.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>The SRND for CCME covers this exact topic here:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a
href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps4625/products_implementation_de \
sign_guide_chapter09186a00805f083a.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voices \
w/ps4625/products_implementation_design_guide_chapter09186a00805f083a.html</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Good luck with the sale!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>-Mark<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> \
cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On \
Behalf Of </b>Curt Shaffer<br> <b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:19 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [cisco-voip] CCME in multiple sites<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>I
have a client who I am working with on a voice solution. They have two offices.
As of now they are connected via site to site VPN for Active Directory, CRM and
mail exchange. The office here is small, only 25 employees. There is no plan
for major growth any time in the foreseeable future. Their remote office is
very, very small. Only 5 employees. Both offices will remain functional but
major employee growth is not expected in either. My question is this…is it
possible for them just to do CCME in both offices with the ability of on net
calls to each other via SIP trunk or will they need to go to Call Manager? I
think Call Manager pricing will make this deal fall through in this case but I
don’t want to push them to something where they are going to loose the benefits
of interconnection. The dial plans can/will be different, each will have PSTN
for local calling in their respective areas, and separate directories will be
fine because of the fact that business in each location is technically local to
that office for the most part. Also how scalable can this solution be if say they
wanted to consolidate some of their long distance calling via the central
office here if that is even possible. Will the costs of just doing Call Manager
now be just as effective as installing/maintaining two CCME systems? Anyone
have a good doc that addresses this decision making process?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Curt<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic